The High Court should dismiss Okla. Jurisdiction in Indian Country


By Terry Campo (April 27, 2022, 4:47 p.m. EDT) — At the urging of the State of Oklahoma, on April 27, the United States Supreme Court heard arguments in Oklahoma v. Castro-Huerta, a case that tests whether the states can prosecute non-Native Americans for crimes committed in Indian Country, especially since those crimes involve non-Native Americans committed against Native Americans.

In a written brief, Oklahoma Attorney General John O’Connor noted March 2 that the state can do this because it has “inherent authority to prosecute non-Indians who commit crimes in Indian Country within its borders, unless Congress notifies such authority”.

O’Connor’s reasoning is directly at odds with…

Stay one step ahead

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You need to know what’s going on with customers, competitors, practice areas and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to stay an expert and beat the competition.

  • Access to case data in articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of lawsuits, etc.)
  • Access to attached documents such as briefs, motions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
  • Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and more!

TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS

Previous Supreme Court Seems Divided in Oklahoma Indian Country Case | Government and politics
Next Singing for Merrie Monarch "instills pride"